Wednesday, August 4, 2010

Israel's Three State Solution IV: One State?

Andrew Sullivan considers a One-State solution based on a poll that says that Palestinians would be interested in it.

The thing about terrorism, though, is that it does tricky things to the idea of democracy -- a majority of people can want something, but a minority of armed thugs can easily destabilize it. If Israel annexed Palestine and gave citizenship to the Palestinians in the West Bank, maybe a majority would agree (I am highly, highly doubtful) but the minority who would oppose it is fairly large, and I have a feeling it would be a fairly acrimonious situation.

Lebanon might be another example of a nation in the region that tried pluralism, but a vocal (and violent) minority destabilized it. With a little help from Israel and Syria.

If there was a three-state solution, wherein Israel and Fatah-administered West Bank were able to form peace, the next step would be, perhaps, a loose federal system that coordinates the two. A slow, long-term process towards a one-State solution, since unlike Zionists I believe that a nation built on a single racial, religious, ethnic, sexual, or any other identity is going to become an inherently unequal nation.

Legal Commentary: Prop 8 Overturned

The 4-3 ruling declared that the state Constitution protects a fundamental "right to marry" that extends equally to same-sex couples. It tossed a highly emotional issue into the election year while opening the way for tens of thousands of gay people to wed in California, starting as early as mid-June.

The majority opinion, by Chief Justice Ronald M. George, declared that any law that discriminates on the basis of sexual orientation will from this point on be constitutionally suspect in California in the same way as laws that discriminate by race or gender, making the state's high court the first in the nation to adopt such a stringent standard.
A lot of people will be focusing on the first paragraph, but I'm actually interested in the second paragraph. Not only in this instance is the law an over-reach, but for the State of California, any law that singles out sexual orientation will be treated as suspect. That's a stronger, broader protection than granting the right of marriage.

Which, of course, is awesome enough.

Tuesday, August 3, 2010

My Mind 8/2 - 8/9

How I was keeping my mind clean this week:
How I was keeping my mind fit this week:
Important facts:
Things to watch in the future:

Sunday, August 1, 2010

Circle Rules Federation - Looking Back

A quick look back at our league's first game of the season (not one my team was in):


My Mind Lately - August Cleaning

How I was keeping my mind clean this week:



How I was keeping my mind fit this week:
Important facts:
Things to watch in the future:

Monetary Policy COMEDY On a Sunday Morning

Monetary Policy on a Sunday Morning

In "proof-that-I-like-sane-conservatives-when-I-find-them" news, this NYTimes Op Ed from Reagan's former Office of Management of the Budget head is a very succinct and thorough accounting of how the Republican party systemically tore to pieces the concept of a balanced budget going all the way back to Richard Nixon. RTWT.

It's a very convincing case of how Republicans have torn apart our financial management, to the point that I almost hate to observe that the Democrats have more involvement in it than the editorial acknowledges. But there's a lot in the op-ed that I certainly hadn't considered before -- particularly how Nixon's choice to end Breton Woods still has crippling effects today.