I promise.
It's been a big bizarre change of pace for me in life.
My day job continues to consume.
I'm now the Director of Operations for the League of Independent Theater.
I'm working on my own solo show, written and everything'd by me (although with plenty of collabofriends at my side, don't worry).
But I'm still here.
A blog about the future of art, the future of politics, and the conversation that makes up our culture.
Friday, January 24, 2014
Monday, September 9, 2013
LOCAL2013: Voter Guide for Artists
I wanted to keep you more in touch with what the League of Independent Theater has been doing for this election (NYC city-wide). I got too tied up to blog about it. (I will likely blog more about it once the election passes).
However, I have put together this voter guide based on who the League of Independent Theater has endorsed in this election. Print it out, take it with you, and make your voice heard.
See more at the site!
However, I have put together this voter guide based on who the League of Independent Theater has endorsed in this election. Print it out, take it with you, and make your voice heard.
(For more background, go to the League's website and see the list of candidates we've endorsed, the platform that those politicians have endorsed, and our endorsement videos, like this one:)
Thursday, August 29, 2013
Is Theater Inherently Elitist?
Question: Is Theater Inherently Elitist?
Yes.
Theater is labor, resource, and real estate intensive.
Theater must therefore be expensive to recoup its costs.
Or theater must rely on the patronage of an elite who can support it.
Theater cannot be mass produced, so it must appeal to specific, local audiences.
Theater is inflexible in format -- you must show up at the appointed time, and view it for the appointed length of time.
Mass produced media is less expensive to create, less expensive to consume, easier to distribute, and easier to consume.
I notice that most of the blogs answering this elitism question seem to be caught up in the content of the plays. Probably because they're written by writers, who are concerned with the writing.
I'm a producer, so I'm interested in how plays are produced, so the answer to that question seems pretty obvious to me.
Yes.
Theater is labor, resource, and real estate intensive.
Theater must therefore be expensive to recoup its costs.
Or theater must rely on the patronage of an elite who can support it.
Theater cannot be mass produced, so it must appeal to specific, local audiences.
Theater is inflexible in format -- you must show up at the appointed time, and view it for the appointed length of time.
Mass produced media is less expensive to create, less expensive to consume, easier to distribute, and easier to consume.
I notice that most of the blogs answering this elitism question seem to be caught up in the content of the plays. Probably because they're written by writers, who are concerned with the writing.
I'm a producer, so I'm interested in how plays are produced, so the answer to that question seems pretty obvious to me.
Friday, June 14, 2013
SHIT YOU SHOULD KNOW: DecideNYC.com
Another part in our continuing series on Shit You Should Know.
It's an election year.
It's an important election. (Mayor, a majority of city council seats, and many other positions are open and competitive -- meaning the city politics could pretty drastically change).
It's really hard to get good information.
That's why you should know about:
DecideNYC.com
It's an election year.
It's an important election. (Mayor, a majority of city council seats, and many other positions are open and competitive -- meaning the city politics could pretty drastically change).
It's really hard to get good information.
That's why you should know about:
DecideNYC.com
- What it is: A very easy to navigate web guide to find out who is running for what positions, and recent news about them. (They also operate a useful Twitter feed).
- Why you should know about it: Because this election is big and complicated but it's also going to determine who is going to piss you off with bike lanes and massive development projects and etc. (By the way, if you want to know who on that list is pro-arts, keep an eye out for the League of Independent Theater endorsements).
- Why you should know about it now:
- The election is coming up swiftly and really, the primaries will settle most of everything by September 10th so now is the perfect time to get involved.
- If you do check out DecideNYC and are as happy with their quality local coverage as I am, contribute to their project like I did today. Quality local coverage is hard to sustain, as New York sees all too clearly, so support it where you can!
Tuesday, June 11, 2013
REVIEW: 3 Kinds of Exile
Typically, I don't enjoy writing a
negative review -- I try to find the positive in the production, or I don't
write a review at all. I figure that usually a bad play -- if it made it far
enough to be seen -- is either a good idea trying to climb out of poor execution
(in which case I focus on engaging with the idea and how to better present it),
or a bad idea that I don't engage with (in which case I don't feel like a bad
review would contribute much.
I also don't write bad reviews
because I try to approach reviewing with a semblance of humility. I have only
just read Isaac's self reflection on the rush to make harsh judgment, and I
worry about stepping over the line myself.
So why am I about to write bad words about John
Guare's 3 Kinds of Exile, now playing at the Atlantic Theater Company? Because,
as a fellow theater producer (albeit a much less successful one) I have honest
questions about how this reached the stage on front of a paying public, in one
of New York's premier theaters without anyone raising an eyebrow.
This Goes Beyond Bechdel
1) A moment where the lead character is pronounced to be attractive by two ladies, and they try to sleep with him.
2) A bride whose only line of dialogue, repeated, is "Fuck me."
Seriously. There's a female character who can only say "Fuck me." And yes, it's in context of a criticism of traditional marriage. But I really don't think that's enough! Not when it's basically a punchline in a long series of gags.
Somewhere, in a full 100 minute piece about exile in which there are female characters -- one of which is about a real-life female person -- there has to be more than three lines to encapsulate their experience, more than a few quick gags to capture their voice.
Am I the first person to ask this question? How did this play make it all the way to a major venue in New York today without someone along the way raising an eyebrow?
The Magical Other
The third act is basically the story about how a sexually repressed Polish exile finds his way to Buenos Aires, and a tempting Latino seduces him away from that rigidly structured world. This tempting Latino is presented as being magical -- hypnotic, satanic.
Guys, I'm not crazy here, right? Did nobody wikipedia this?
It's Kind Of Hard Out Here For an Artist (What?!)
So, that's already two big problems that seem to me that should have been huge liabilities before this play made it to the stage. There's another one that sticks out to me, which is that both the second and third acts are tragic stories of unrealized, victimized artists.
Don't get me wrong -- if you're a true master, you can make a good tortured artist story. Amadeus is probably a good example in that genre. I'm willing to let Sunday in the Park with George slide, mostly on the back of its music.
But for the most part, the staggering majority of "tortured artist" stories tend to be exercises in self-indulgence; here, the self-indulgence goes so far that John Guare, as an actor playing the role of John Guare in the play written by John Guare, refers in the third person to a character in the story who is John Guare. At which point a projection of John Guare is visible, as though we don't get that the person standing in front of us describing the story is the same John Guare.
Both protagonists in the second and third acts are presented as will-less victims, buffeted by their fate, misunderstood by their peers and family and lacking all agency in the world around them. Which is as negative an impression of artists as you could devise. And very little that is sympathetic is provided about them either. Instead, we are simply asked to connect to their suffering because it is suffering, and because artists are noble creatures that should not be in pain, I guess.
Editing?
All of this, as well as the overly long span of time that the three pieces take up and the repetitive, over-explanation of the messages and morals in each of the pieces (replete with unending rhetorical questions), indicate to me that John Guare was basically allowed to do whatever. It has a very unedited feel; my play-going companion detected a distinct "undergraduate thesis" vibe.
I don't know how it got here. I don't know how it edged out the thousands of equally competent playwrights and plays that are circulating out in the world. I'm not sure how the bizarre casting, the uneven acting styles, the offensive choices, etc. were allowed to stand in a venue with those kind of resources.
My god, what Taylor Mac or Aaron Landsman or Sarah Ruhl or Susan Lori-Parks or a thousand other people could have done.
Regret
I want to end my review by honoring the people who worked on this. Genuinely. It leaves a bad taste in my mouth to trash a production, knowing the time and dedication that came from a talented group of performers and designers. I'm just baffled how this incredible wealth of resources came to be marshaled for this production.
Regret
I want to end my review by honoring the people who worked on this. Genuinely. It leaves a bad taste in my mouth to trash a production, knowing the time and dedication that came from a talented group of performers and designers. I'm just baffled how this incredible wealth of resources came to be marshaled for this production.
(As required by law, here is a disclaimer that I got the tickets for free.)
Monday, June 10, 2013
Monday, June 3, 2013
LOCAL2013: **ACTION ITEM** Support LITNY's Endorsed Candidates
The following is a press release from the League of Independent Theater, who are endorsing some key political players who are running for office -- all of whom have adopted our Performing Arts Platform.
We need your help.
If you want to reward these politicians for coming to the cultural tables, come out on Wednesday (June 5th) at 11:30 (FB event here). We want to show the cameras how big a force the independent performing arts and culture community is.
We need your help.
If you want to reward these politicians for coming to the cultural tables, come out on Wednesday (June 5th) at 11:30 (FB event here). We want to show the cameras how big a force the independent performing arts and culture community is.
THE LEAGUE OF INDEPENDENT THEATER
SET TO ANNOUNCE FIRST SLATE OF POLITICAL ENDORSEMENTS
SCOTT M. STRINGER, JULIE MENIN, JIMMY VAN BRAMER
and OTHERS LEAD THE MOVEMENT TO SUPPORT
THE PERFORMING ARTS IN NEW YORK CITY
PRESS ANNOUNCEMENT SET FOR WEDNESDAY JUNE 5th, 11:30 A.M.
85 EAST 4TH STREET (BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND AVENUES),
AT THE LEGENDARY HOME OF THE KRAINE THEATER
PLEASE JOIN STRINGER/MENIN/VAN BRAMER
AND OTHER CANDIDATES ON
THE STEPS OF THE KRAINE THEATER
AS LIT MAKES ITS FIRST POLITICAL ENDORSEMENTS OF
THE 2013 NEW YORK CITY ELECTION CYCLE.
Fighting for the vibrant cultural sector of New York City means fighting for independent theater across all five boroughs. The League of Independent Theater’s mission is to support those artists and venues throughout the City, and to identify candidates in each of those communities to work on their behalf.
As the only 501(c)6 advocacy organization for the independent theater and performing arts population of New York City, the League of Independent Theater (which supports the interests of over 50,000 artists who vote regularly*) is proud to stand with and endorse Manhattan Borough President, Scott M. Stringer for Comptroller of The City of New York, Julie Menin for Manhattan Borough President, Jimmy Van Bramer for City Council, and other pro-Arts candidates including: Jenifer Rajkumar – District 1; Ben Kallos – District 5; Ken Biberaj – District 6; Melissa Mark-Viverito – District 8; Cliff Stanton – District 11 and Rory Lancman – District 24.
In the winter of 2009, an audience of over 300 independent theater artists and performing arts supporters attended a Community Board Congress forum on the perilous state of the small to midsized theater sector throughout the City where Borough President Scott M. Stringer challenged our sector to create a pro-arts platform. After years of organizational meetings, private discussions and coalition building, the League of Independent Theater unveiled this platform at our “Meet the Candidates” event on March 12, 2013 at The Players Club**. This comprehensive eight-plank platform will encourage, leverage and strengthen the independent theater sector of New York City.
Despite the many financial, logistical, and creative barriers, it is a widely documented and accepted truth that the independent theater community continues to power the City’s culture and contribute to the local economy. LIT’s goal is to seek advocates in government who understand the challenges that the independent theater community faces, and will partner on specific actions to ease those burdens. Because of Scott M. Stringer, Julie Menin, Jimmy Van Bramer, Jenifer Rajkumar, Ben Kallos, Ken Biberaj, Melissa Mark-Viverito, Cliff Stanton,and Rory Lancman’s belief in us, we believe in them and are very proud to endorse and work to galvanize the independent performing arts section (50,000+ strong) to support these candidates in their upcoming races.
*NYITF Study, 2008. www.nyitawards.com/survey/oobdemographics.pdf
**Videos of this event can be viewed at www.litny.org.
The following eight (8) points make up the League of Independent Theater’s performing arts platform.
1. Create access to low-cost and/or no-cost Community Facilities Spaces that are currently available and remain unused throughout the City through the creation of a Community Facilities Space Database.
2. Create access to empty and unused City property to be re-purposed as temporary rehearsal, office and (if appropriate), performance space.
3. Include non-profit performance venues in the favorable electricity and utility rates enjoyed by religious institutions and the VFW.
4. Implement a proposal that would reduce or eliminate property tax assessments for those non-profit organizations that have an artistic mission and/or rent performance space to similar non-profit performing arts groups with artistic missions of their own. All twelve (12) Manhattan Community Boards unanimously ratified this proposal.
5. Secure affordable permanent low-cost housing for working artists. In addition, work to provide access to affordable healthcare for these artists, depending on the status and reach of the Affordable Care Act at the time of negotiations.
6. Support the commission of an economic impact study for the independent theater territory.
7. Work with the Department of Cultural Affairs to expand the Cultural Institutions Group to include the independent theater sector’s anchor venues.
8. Install plaques at sites of historical import and rename streets after the founders of the independent and Off-Off Broadway community.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)